Digital media can provide effective support for face-to-face teaching in the lecture theatre. So-called Audience Response Systems (ARS) are particularly useful in this context. They make it possible to carry out surveys during a lecture. Students can use their end devices or go online to select an answer from a prescribed list –similar to the quiz show "Who wants to be a millionaire?“. The results of the voting are then presented visually in the lecture theatre.
In this way, teaching staff can quickly gauge the current level of knowledge in their audience and can then perhaps go through or repeat topics that have not been understood. These feedback systems also allow students to get anonymous feedback on their learning progress. The use of audience response systems makes particular sense in large groups as they involve all the participants at the same time and allow them all to take an active part.
Systems with hardware support or web-based systems
There are a number of different systems that can be used for voting. It is important to distinguish between systems with hardware support and those with software support. Systems with hardware support include small wireless devices – known as "clickers" – which allow students to transmit the selected answer by pressing a button. Web-based voting systems function without the need for an additional device, as the answer is entered via an app on the student's smartphone or tablet, or is entered directly into the browser.
Access
Cliqr in Stud.IP
Easy to use. Enables single-choice polls. Voting takes place on mobile devices after entering the URL or scanning the QR code. Questions and answers are processed via Stud.IP. In a Stud.IP event, the tool can be activated under the ‘Administration’ tab by clicking on the corresponding box.
EduVote
Easy handling. Allows single-choice queries with mobile devices (website or app). The question text and the answer texts are exclusively stored locally on the speaker's computer. Integration into Power-Point possible. Campus license exists.
Further information
Teaching examples
- Frank Ollermann (2017): Clicker einmal anders. Aktivierung von Vorwissen per Texteingabe. Webinar-Aufzeichnung im Rahmen des Projekts eCULT (Ansehen auf YouTube)
- Birgit Wittenberg (2015): Interaktives Feedback und Wissensabfragen in der Präsenzlehre. Webinar-Aufzeichnung im Rahmen des Projekts eCULT (Ansehen auf YouTube)
- Dr. Ralf Steffen (2015): eFeedback/Audience Response. Webinar-Aufzeichnung im Rahmen des Projekts eCULT (Ansehen auf YouTube)
Literature
- Jeffrey R. Stowell and Jason M. Nelson (2007): Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning and Emotion. In: Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 4
- Beitrag auf e-teaching.org: "Elektronische Abstimmungssysteme (Technik)"
- Gastbeitrag von Dr. Heiko Witt (Universität Hamburg) auf e-teaching.org: "Abstimmungssysteme (Didaktik)"
- Wiki zum Thema "Audience Response" des niedersächsischen ELAN e.V.
- Universität Hamburg – eLearning-Blog der WiSo-Fakultät: "Langzeitbefragung: Studierende bewerten Clicker durchgehend positiv"
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen – allgemeine Informationen zu ARS und Tabelle mit Überblick über den Funktionsumfang verschiedener Abstimmungssysteme
- OnlineTED – an der Technischen Universität München speziell für die Hochschullehre entwickeltes webbasiertes Abstimmungssystem
Contact
30167 Hannover
30167 Hannover